Fulham vs West Richmond, SA suburb comparison

Fulham for retirees; West Richmond for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FulhamWest Richmond

Overall score

Fulham

50.2/100

West Richmond

42.3/100

Crime rate

Fulham

78.3 / 1k

West Richmond

96.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fulham

64

West Richmond

28

Population

Fulham

2,920

West Richmond

1,087

Metric leadFulham 7West Richmond 2across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFulhamWest Richmond
Overall score50.2/10042.3/100
Housing (desirability)17.1/10040.2/100
Crime rate78.3 / 1k96.9 / 1k
Public transport stops142
Walkability56.0/1007.0/100
Nearby amenities6428
Planning activity5211
Population2,9201,087
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/103/10

Comparison summary

Fulham reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; West Richmond is a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm.

Fulham tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while West Richmond stands out for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook. Fulham generally means more sought-after housing, while West Richmond leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Fulham if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward West Richmond for families and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons