Overall score
Kurralta Park
47.3/100
West Richmond
36.1/100
Kurralta Park vs West Richmond, SA Suburb Comparison
Kurralta Park for schools; West Richmond for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kurralta ParkWest Richmond
Crime rate
Kurralta Park
61.7 / 1k
West Richmond
74.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kurralta Park
67
West Richmond
32
Population
Kurralta Park
3,139
West Richmond
1,087
Metric leadKurralta Park 9West Richmond 11 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for best valueWest Richmond
- Best for best schoolsKurralta Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kurralta Park | West Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.3/100 | 36.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.5/100 | 57.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 61.7 / 1k | 74.6 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 2 |
| Walkability | 75.5/100 | 7.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 67 | 32 |
| Planning activity | 36 | 13 |
| Green cover | 2.2% | 0.0% |
| Population | 3,139 | 1,087 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Kurralta Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and West Richmond is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.
Kurralta Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, whereas West Richmond is the better pick for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
Kurralta Park suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas West Richmond is the stronger match for families, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.