Kurralta Park vs Mile End, SA Suburb Comparison

Kurralta Park for retirees and families; Mile End for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kurralta ParkMile End

Overall score

Kurralta Park

47.3/100

Mile End

46.6/100

Crime rate

Kurralta Park

61.7 / 1k

Mile End

104.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kurralta Park

67

Mile End

195

Population

Kurralta Park

3,139

Mile End

4,536

Metric leadKurralta Park 6Mile End 32 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKurralta ParkMile End
Overall score47.3/10046.6/100
Housing (desirability)58.5/10057.1/100
Crime rate61.7 / 1k104.6 / 1k
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops1314
Walkability75.5/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities67195
Planning activity3654
Green cover2.2%1.2%
Population3,1394,536
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/107/10

Comparison summary

Kurralta Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Mile End is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Kurralta Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, walkability, and tree cover and green space, whereas Mile End is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Kurralta Park the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mile End.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons