Kurralta Park vs Mile End, SA suburb comparison

Kurralta Park for retirees and families; Mile End for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kurralta ParkMile End

Overall score

Kurralta Park

54.4/100

Mile End

53.3/100

Crime rate

Kurralta Park

47.0 / 1k

Mile End

89.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kurralta Park

63

Mile End

192

Population

Kurralta Park

3,139

Mile End

4,536

Metric leadKurralta Park 4Mile End 41 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKurralta ParkMile End
Overall score54.4/10053.3/100
Housing (desirability)27.0/10036.7/100
Crime rate47.0 / 1k89.6 / 1k
Public transport stops1314
Walkability75.5/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities63192
Planning activity2641
Population3,1394,536
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/107/10

Comparison summary

Kurralta Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Mile End is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Kurralta Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Mile End is the better pick for housing affordability and public transport access.

Retirees and families may find Kurralta Park the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mile End.

Related comparisons