Keswick vs Mile End, SA Suburb Comparison

Keswick for families and investment; Mile End for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KeswickMile End

Overall score

Keswick

45.0/100

Mile End

46.6/100

Crime rate

Keswick

128.0 / 1k

Mile End

104.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Keswick

123

Mile End

195

Population

Keswick

754

Mile End

4,536

Metric leadKeswick 2Mile End 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKeswickMile End
Overall score45.0/10046.6/100
Housing (desirability)53.9/10057.1/100
Crime rate128.0 / 1k104.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops914
Walkability17.5/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities123195
Planning activity1354
Green cover1.9%1.2%
Population7544,536
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/107/10

Comparison summary

Keswick is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Mile End is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Keswick tends to lead on tree cover and green space, plus a calmer planning outlook, while Mile End stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mile End, while Keswick remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons