Mile End vs Underdale, SA Suburb Comparison

Mile End for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mile EndUnderdale

Overall score

Mile End

46.6/100

Underdale

36.2/100

Crime rate

Mile End

104.6 / 1k

Underdale

70.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mile End

195

Underdale

81

Population

Mile End

4,536

Underdale

2,429

Metric leadMile End 5Underdale 33 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMile EndUnderdale
Overall score46.6/10036.2/100
Housing (desirability)57.1/10058.9/100
Crime rate104.6 / 1k70.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops1414
Walkability75.0/10021.0/100
Nearby amenities19581
Planning activity5437
Green cover1.2%0.0%
Population4,5362,429
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mile End is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Underdale is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.

Mile End pulls ahead on housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Underdale is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

Families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Mile End the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Underdale.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons