Brooklyn Park vs Mile End, SA Suburb Comparison

Brooklyn Park for families; Mile End for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Brooklyn ParkMile End

Overall score

Brooklyn Park

41.3/100

Mile End

46.6/100

Crime rate

Brooklyn Park

57.5 / 1k

Mile End

104.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Brooklyn Park

140

Mile End

195

Population

Brooklyn Park

5,040

Mile End

4,536

Metric leadBrooklyn Park 5Mile End 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBrooklyn ParkMile End
Overall score41.3/10046.6/100
Housing (desirability)57.2/10057.1/100
Crime rate57.5 / 1k104.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops1914
Walkability67.5/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities140195
Planning activity5354
Green cover0.7%1.2%
Population5,0404,536
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Brooklyn Park reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Mile End is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Brooklyn Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Mile End is the better pick for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Choose Brooklyn Park if you are weighing investors; lean toward Mile End for families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons