Camden Park vs West Richmond, SA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Camden Park | West Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.7/100 | 36.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.9/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 56.0 / 1k | 104.0 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 22 | 2 |
| Walkability | 36.0/100 | 5.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 71 | 25 |
| Planning activity | 28 | 8 |
| Population | 3,338 | 1,087 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 3/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesCamden Park
- Best for investmentWest Richmond
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Camden Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and West Richmond is a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm.
Camden Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, whereas West Richmond is the better pick for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook. Camden Park generally means more sought-after housing, while West Richmond leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees may find Camden Park the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer West Richmond.