Camden Park vs West Richmond, SA suburb comparison

Camden Park for retirees and families; West Richmond for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Camden ParkWest Richmond

Overall score

Camden Park

47.7/100

West Richmond

42.3/100

Crime rate

Camden Park

48.3 / 1k

West Richmond

96.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Camden Park

71

West Richmond

28

Population

Camden Park

3,338

West Richmond

1,087

Metric leadCamden Park 7West Richmond 2across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCamden ParkWest Richmond
Overall score47.7/10042.3/100
Housing (desirability)30.9/10040.2/100
Crime rate48.3 / 1k96.9 / 1k
Public transport stops222
Walkability36.0/1007.0/100
Nearby amenities7128
Planning activity3211
Population3,3381,087
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Camden Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and West Richmond is a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm.

Camden Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, whereas West Richmond is the better pick for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook. Camden Park generally means more sought-after housing, while West Richmond leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Camden Park, while West Richmond remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons