Overall score
Camden Park
47.7/100
Kurralta Park
54.4/100
Camden Park for investment; Kurralta Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Camden Park
47.7/100
Kurralta Park
54.4/100
Crime rate
Camden Park
48.3 / 1k
Kurralta Park
47.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Camden Park
71
Kurralta Park
63
Population
Camden Park
3,338
Kurralta Park
3,139
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Camden Park | Kurralta Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.7/100 | 54.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.9/100 | 27.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 48.3 / 1k | 47.0 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 22 | 13 |
| Walkability | 36.0/100 | 75.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 71 | 63 |
| Planning activity | 31 | 26 |
| Population | 3,338 | 3,139 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Camden Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Kurralta Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Camden Park tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Kurralta Park stands out for a quieter safety profile and walkability.
Camden Park suits investors more clearly, whereas Kurralta Park is the stronger match for retirees and families.