Overall score
Camden Park
50.7/100
Marleston
43.6/100
Camden Park vs Marleston, SA suburb comparison
Camden Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Camden ParkMarleston
Crime rate
Camden Park
33.1 / 1k
Marleston
55.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Camden Park
71
Marleston
129
Population
Camden Park
3,338
Marleston
1,950
Metric leadCamden Park 5Marleston 4across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesCamden Park
- Best for familiesCamden Park
- Best for investmentCamden Park
- Best for best schoolsCamden Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Camden Park | Marleston |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.7/100 | 43.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.9/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.1 / 1k | 55.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 22 | 13 |
| Walkability | 36.0/100 | 40.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 71 | 129 |
| Planning activity | 32 | 31 |
| Population | 3,338 | 1,950 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Camden Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Marleston is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.
Camden Park tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Marleston stands out for housing affordability and walkability. Camden Park generally means more sought-after housing, while Marleston leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Camden Park, while Marleston remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.