Craigieburn vs Meadow Heights, VIC Suburb Comparison

Craigieburn for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CraigieburnMeadow Heights

Overall score

Craigieburn

44.1/100

Meadow Heights

33.9/100

Crime rate

Craigieburn

61.6 / 1k

Meadow Heights

69.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Craigieburn

928

Meadow Heights

175

Population

Craigieburn

65,178

Meadow Heights

14,890

Metric leadCraigieburn 10Meadow Heights 21 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCraigieburnMeadow Heights
Overall score44.1/10033.9/100
Housing (desirability)41.0/10040.4/100
Crime rate61.6 / 1k69.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools74
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves7356
Public transport stops23161
Walkability100.0/10059.0/100
Nearby amenities928175
Planning activity19074
Green cover11.4%21.0%
Population65,17814,890
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Craigieburn reads as an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Meadow Heights is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks. Meadow Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Craigieburn keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Craigieburn is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; Meadow Heights answers with a calmer planning outlook. Craigieburn generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Meadow Heights leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Craigieburn, while Meadow Heights remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons