Craigieburn vs Roxburgh Park, VIC Suburb Comparison

Craigieburn for retirees and families; Roxburgh Park for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CraigieburnRoxburgh Park

Overall score

Craigieburn

44.1/100

Roxburgh Park

41.9/100

Crime rate

Craigieburn

61.6 / 1k

Roxburgh Park

52.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Craigieburn

928

Roxburgh Park

238

Population

Craigieburn

65,178

Roxburgh Park

24,129

Metric leadCraigieburn 9Roxburgh Park 31 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCraigieburnRoxburgh Park
Overall score44.1/10041.9/100
Housing (desirability)41.0/10038.4/100
Crime rate61.6 / 1k52.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools76
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves7339
Public transport stops23175
Walkability100.0/10072.0/100
Nearby amenities928238
Planning activity19035
Green cover11.4%17.5%
Population65,17824,129
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Craigieburn is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Roxburgh Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Craigieburn pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Roxburgh Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Craigieburn sits in a gently premium band, compared with a affordable feel in Roxburgh Park.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Craigieburn, while Roxburgh Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons