Overall score
Croydon Park
62.8/100
Hurlstone Park
51.5/100
Croydon Park for families and value; Hurlstone Park for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Croydon Park
62.8/100
Hurlstone Park
51.5/100
Crime rate
Croydon Park
27.4 / 1k
Hurlstone Park
32.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Croydon Park
232
Hurlstone Park
132
Population
Croydon Park
10,929
Hurlstone Park
5,001
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Croydon Park | Hurlstone Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.8/100 | 51.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 23.2/100 | 19.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 27.4 / 1k | 32.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 17 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 73 | 48 |
| Walkability | 86.0/100 | 36.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 232 | 132 |
| Planning activity | 24 | 22 |
| Population | 10,929 | 5,001 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Croydon Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Hurlstone Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Croydon Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Hurlstone Park is closer to the city centre.
On the data, Croydon Park is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hurlstone Park answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Families and value-focused buyers may find Croydon Park the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Hurlstone Park.