Croydon Park vs Hurlstone Park, NSW suburb comparison

Croydon Park for families and value; Hurlstone Park for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Croydon ParkHurlstone Park

Overall score

Croydon Park

62.8/100

Hurlstone Park

51.5/100

Crime rate

Croydon Park

27.4 / 1k

Hurlstone Park

32.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Croydon Park

232

Hurlstone Park

132

Population

Croydon Park

10,929

Hurlstone Park

5,001

Metric leadCroydon Park 8Hurlstone Park 3across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCroydon ParkHurlstone Park
Overall score62.8/10051.5/100
Housing (desirability)23.2/10019.1/100
Crime rate27.4 / 1k32.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1217
Parks & reserves126
Public transport stops7348
Walkability86.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities232132
Planning activity2422
Population10,9295,001
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Croydon Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Hurlstone Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Croydon Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Hurlstone Park is closer to the city centre.

On the data, Croydon Park is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hurlstone Park answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Families and value-focused buyers may find Croydon Park the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Hurlstone Park.

Related comparisons

Croydon Park vs Hurlstone Park, NSW suburb… | Suburb Guide