Clemton Park vs Hurlstone Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Clemton Park for retirees and families; Hurlstone Park for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Clemton ParkHurlstone Park

Overall score

Clemton Park

43.2/100

Hurlstone Park

51.9/100

Crime rate

Clemton Park

23.8 / 1k

Hurlstone Park

32.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clemton Park

12

Hurlstone Park

139

Population

Clemton Park

1,676

Hurlstone Park

5,001

Metric leadClemton Park 1Hurlstone Park 111 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClemton ParkHurlstone Park
Overall score43.2/10051.9/100
Housing (desirability)46.5/10053.6/100
Crime rate23.8 / 1k32.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1217
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves26
Public transport stops248
Walkability3.0/10038.0/100
Nearby amenities12139
Planning activity2523
Green cover4.7%5.4%
Population1,6765,001
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Clemton Park reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Hurlstone Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Clemton Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Hurlstone Park is closer to the city centre.

Clemton Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Hurlstone Park stands out for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Clemton Park the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Hurlstone Park.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons