Clemton Park vs Hurlstone Park, NSW suburb comparison

Clemton Park for families and value; Hurlstone Park for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Clemton ParkHurlstone Park

Overall score

Clemton Park

37.7/100

Hurlstone Park

51.5/100

Crime rate

Clemton Park

23.8 / 1k

Hurlstone Park

32.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clemton Park

9

Hurlstone Park

132

Population

Clemton Park

1,676

Hurlstone Park

5,001

Metric leadClemton Park 2Hurlstone Park 9across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClemton ParkHurlstone Park
Overall score37.7/10051.5/100
Housing (desirability)43.1/10019.1/100
Crime rate23.8 / 1k32.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1217
Parks & reserves26
Public transport stops248
Walkability3.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities9132
Planning activity2522
Population1,6765,001
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Clemton Park reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Hurlstone Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Clemton Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Hurlstone Park is closer to the city centre.

Clemton Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Hurlstone Park stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access.

Families and value-focused buyers may find Clemton Park the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Hurlstone Park.

Related comparisons

Clemton Park vs Hurlstone Park, NSW suburb… | Suburb Guide