Belfield vs Clemton Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Belfield for retirees and investment; Clemton Park for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BelfieldClemton Park

Overall score

Belfield

50.1/100

Clemton Park

43.2/100

Crime rate

Belfield

29.0 / 1k

Clemton Park

23.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belfield

85

Clemton Park

12

Population

Belfield

6,555

Clemton Park

1,676

Metric leadBelfield 10Clemton Park 12 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelfieldClemton Park
Overall score50.1/10043.2/100
Housing (desirability)53.8/10046.5/100
Crime rate29.0 / 1k23.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1512
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves72
Public transport stops572
Walkability36.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities8512
Planning activity625
Green cover12.9%4.7%
Population6,5551,676
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/107/10

Comparison summary

Belfield is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Clemton Park is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Belfield pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Clemton Park is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Belfield suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Clemton Park is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons