Overall score
Clemton Park
43.2/100
Roselands
45.1/100
Clemton Park for retirees and families; Roselands for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clemton Park
43.2/100
Roselands
45.1/100
Crime rate
Clemton Park
23.8 / 1k
Roselands
53.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clemton Park
12
Roselands
156
Population
Clemton Park
1,676
Roselands
12,356
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clemton Park | Roselands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.2/100 | 45.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.5/100 | 28.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.8 / 1k | 53.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 16 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 150 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 65.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 12 | 156 |
| Planning activity | 25 | 22 |
| Green cover | 4.7% | 1.4% |
| Population | 1,676 | 12,356 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Clemton Park is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Roselands is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Clemton Park pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Roselands is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Clemton Park suits retirees, families, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Roselands is the stronger match for investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.