Clemton Park vs Roselands, NSW Suburb Comparison

Clemton Park for retirees and families; Roselands for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Clemton ParkRoselands

Overall score

Clemton Park

43.2/100

Roselands

45.1/100

Crime rate

Clemton Park

23.8 / 1k

Roselands

53.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clemton Park

12

Roselands

156

Population

Clemton Park

1,676

Roselands

12,356

Metric leadClemton Park 4Roselands 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClemton ParkRoselands
Overall score43.2/10045.1/100
Housing (desirability)46.5/10028.1/100
Crime rate23.8 / 1k53.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1216
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves28
Public transport stops2150
Walkability3.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities12156
Planning activity2522
Green cover4.7%1.4%
Population1,67612,356
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Clemton Park is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Roselands is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Clemton Park pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Roselands is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Clemton Park suits retirees, families, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Roselands is the stronger match for investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons