Overall score
Kingsgrove
69.0/100
Roselands
53.2/100
Kingsgrove vs Roselands, NSW suburb comparison
Kingsgrove for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
KingsgroveRoselands
Crime rate
Kingsgrove
43.0 / 1k
Roselands
53.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kingsgrove
278
Roselands
147
Population
Kingsgrove
12,881
Roselands
12,356
Metric leadKingsgrove 9Roselands 2across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesKingsgrove
- Best for familiesKingsgrove
- Best for best valueKingsgrove
- Best for best schoolsKingsgrove
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kingsgrove | Roselands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 69.0/100 | 53.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.1/100 | 24.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.0 / 1k | 53.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 16 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 173 | 150 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 65.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 278 | 147 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 19 |
| Population | 12,881 | 12,356 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Kingsgrove is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Roselands is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Kingsgrove is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Roselands answers with excellent public transport and good access to parks.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kingsgrove, while Roselands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.