Overall score
Kingsgrove
60.9/100
Roselands
45.1/100
Kingsgrove for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kingsgrove
60.9/100
Roselands
45.1/100
Crime rate
Kingsgrove
43.0 / 1k
Roselands
53.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kingsgrove
310
Roselands
156
Population
Kingsgrove
12,881
Roselands
12,356
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kingsgrove | Roselands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.9/100 | 45.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.5/100 | 28.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.0 / 1k | 53.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 16 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 173 | 150 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 65.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 310 | 156 |
| Planning activity | 24 | 22 |
| Green cover | 4.5% | 1.4% |
| Population | 12,881 | 12,356 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Kingsgrove is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Roselands is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Kingsgrove is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Roselands answers with schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kingsgrove, while Roselands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.