Kingsgrove vs Roselands, NSW Suburb Comparison

Kingsgrove for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KingsgroveRoselands

Overall score

Kingsgrove

60.9/100

Roselands

45.1/100

Crime rate

Kingsgrove

43.0 / 1k

Roselands

53.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kingsgrove

310

Roselands

156

Population

Kingsgrove

12,881

Roselands

12,356

Metric leadKingsgrove 10Roselands 21 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKingsgroveRoselands
Overall score60.9/10045.1/100
Housing (desirability)53.5/10028.1/100
Crime rate43.0 / 1k53.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1316
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves138
Public transport stops173150
Walkability100.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities310156
Planning activity2422
Green cover4.5%1.4%
Population12,88112,356
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kingsgrove is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Roselands is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Kingsgrove is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Roselands answers with schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kingsgrove, while Roselands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons