Belmore vs Roselands, NSW Suburb Comparison

Belmore for retirees and investment; Roselands for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BelmoreRoselands

Overall score

Belmore

46.3/100

Roselands

45.1/100

Crime rate

Belmore

40.8 / 1k

Roselands

53.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belmore

149

Roselands

156

Population

Belmore

13,781

Roselands

12,356

Metric leadBelmore 8Roselands 41 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelmoreRoselands
Overall score46.3/10045.1/100
Housing (desirability)35.8/10028.1/100
Crime rate40.8 / 1k53.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1916
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves118
Public transport stops109150
Walkability55.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities149156
Planning activity1722
Green cover2.9%1.4%
Population13,78112,356
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Belmore is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Roselands is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Belmore pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Roselands is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Belmore, while Roselands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons