Overall score
Belmore
58.6/100
Roselands
53.2/100
Belmore for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Belmore
58.6/100
Roselands
53.2/100
Crime rate
Belmore
40.8 / 1k
Roselands
53.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belmore
144
Roselands
147
Population
Belmore
13,781
Roselands
12,356
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belmore | Roselands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.6/100 | 53.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 17.3/100 | 24.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 40.8 / 1k | 53.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 19 | 16 |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 109 | 150 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 65.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 144 | 147 |
| Planning activity | 14 | 19 |
| Population | 13,781 | 12,356 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Belmore is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Roselands is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Belmore pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Roselands is the better pick for housing affordability and public transport access.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Belmore, while Roselands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.