Overall score
Belmore
58.6/100
Kingsgrove
69.0/100
Kingsgrove for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Belmore
58.6/100
Kingsgrove
69.0/100
Crime rate
Belmore
40.8 / 1k
Kingsgrove
43.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belmore
144
Kingsgrove
278
Population
Belmore
13,781
Kingsgrove
12,881
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belmore | Kingsgrove |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.6/100 | 69.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 17.3/100 | 43.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 40.8 / 1k | 43.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 19 | 13 |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 109 | 173 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 144 | 278 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 23 |
| Population | 13,781 | 12,881 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Belmore is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Kingsgrove is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Belmore tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Kingsgrove stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Kingsgrove, while Belmore remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.