Overall score
Earlwood
63.3/100
Kingsgrove
60.9/100
Earlwood for retirees; Kingsgrove for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Earlwood
63.3/100
Kingsgrove
60.9/100
Crime rate
Earlwood
23.6 / 1k
Kingsgrove
43.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Earlwood
250
Kingsgrove
310
Population
Earlwood
18,053
Kingsgrove
12,881
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Earlwood | Kingsgrove |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.3/100 | 60.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.9/100 | 53.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.6 / 1k | 43.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 13 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 166 | 173 |
| Walkability | 86.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 250 | 310 |
| Planning activity | 47 | 24 |
| Green cover | 17.8% | 4.5% |
| Population | 18,053 | 12,881 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Earlwood reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Kingsgrove is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Earlwood sits closer to the city centre, whereas Kingsgrove is in a middle-ring position.
Earlwood tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a larger local community, while Kingsgrove stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.
Retirees may find Earlwood the better fit, while families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kingsgrove.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.