Overall score
Earlwood
66.0/100
Kingsgrove
69.0/100
Earlwood vs Kingsgrove, NSW suburb comparison
Earlwood for retirees; Kingsgrove for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
EarlwoodKingsgrove
Crime rate
Earlwood
23.6 / 1k
Kingsgrove
43.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Earlwood
228
Kingsgrove
278
Population
Earlwood
18,053
Kingsgrove
12,881
Metric leadEarlwood 4Kingsgrove 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesEarlwood
- Best for familiesKingsgrove
- Best for best valueKingsgrove
- Best for best schoolsKingsgrove
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Earlwood | Kingsgrove |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66.0/100 | 69.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.8/100 | 43.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.6 / 1k | 43.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 13 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 166 | 173 |
| Walkability | 86.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 228 | 278 |
| Planning activity | 41 | 22 |
| Population | 18,053 | 12,881 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Earlwood reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Kingsgrove is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Earlwood sits closer to the city centre, whereas Kingsgrove is in a middle-ring position.
Earlwood tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a larger local community, while Kingsgrove stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options.
On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kingsgrove, while Earlwood remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.