Overall score
Ashbury
55.3/100
Earlwood
63.3/100
Ashbury for families and value; Earlwood for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Ashbury
55.3/100
Earlwood
63.3/100
Crime rate
Ashbury
32.5 / 1k
Earlwood
23.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ashbury
118
Earlwood
250
Population
Ashbury
3,353
Earlwood
18,053
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ashbury | Earlwood |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.3/100 | 63.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.5/100 | 42.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 32.5 / 1k | 23.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 19 | 14 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 31 | 166 |
| Walkability | 38.0/100 | 86.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 118 | 250 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 47 |
| Green cover | 11.1% | 17.8% |
| Population | 3,353 | 18,053 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Ashbury reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Earlwood is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Ashbury is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Earlwood answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Investors and households prioritising schools may find Ashbury the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Earlwood.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.