Ashbury vs Earlwood, NSW Suburb Comparison

Ashbury for families and value; Earlwood for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AshburyEarlwood

Overall score

Ashbury

55.3/100

Earlwood

63.3/100

Crime rate

Ashbury

32.5 / 1k

Earlwood

23.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ashbury

118

Earlwood

250

Population

Ashbury

3,353

Earlwood

18,053

Metric leadAshbury 4Earlwood 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAshburyEarlwood
Overall score55.3/10063.3/100
Housing (desirability)49.5/10042.9/100
Crime rate32.5 / 1k23.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1914
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves313
Public transport stops31166
Walkability38.0/10086.0/100
Nearby amenities118250
Planning activity2047
Green cover11.1%17.8%
Population3,35318,053
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Ashbury reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Earlwood is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Ashbury is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Earlwood answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Investors and households prioritising schools may find Ashbury the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Earlwood.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons