Overall score
Ashbury
50.8/100
Earlwood
66.0/100
Ashbury vs Earlwood, NSW suburb comparison
Ashbury for investment and schools; Earlwood for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AshburyEarlwood
Crime rate
Ashbury
32.5 / 1k
Earlwood
23.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ashbury
112
Earlwood
228
Population
Ashbury
3,353
Earlwood
18,053
Metric leadAshbury 4Earlwood 7across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ashbury | Earlwood |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.8/100 | 66.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.3/100 | 30.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 32.5 / 1k | 23.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 19 | 14 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 31 | 166 |
| Walkability | 38.0/100 | 86.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 112 | 228 |
| Planning activity | 18 | 43 |
| Population | 3,353 | 18,053 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Ashbury reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Earlwood is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Ashbury is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; Earlwood answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.
Investors may find Ashbury the better fit, while families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Earlwood.