Overall score
Ashbury
55.3/100
Clemton Park
43.2/100
Ashbury vs Clemton Park, NSW Suburb Comparison
Ashbury for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AshburyClemton Park
Crime rate
Ashbury
32.5 / 1k
Clemton Park
23.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ashbury
118
Clemton Park
12
Population
Ashbury
3,353
Clemton Park
1,676
Metric leadAshbury 11Clemton Park 11 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ashbury | Clemton Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.3/100 | 43.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.5/100 | 46.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 32.5 / 1k | 23.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 19 | 12 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 31 | 2 |
| Walkability | 38.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 118 | 12 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 25 |
| Green cover | 11.1% | 4.7% |
| Population | 3,353 | 1,676 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Ashbury is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Clemton Park is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Ashbury sits closer to the city centre, whereas Clemton Park is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Ashbury is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Clemton Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Ashbury, while Clemton Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.