Clemton Park vs Earlwood, NSW suburb comparison

Clemton Park for families and schools; Earlwood for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Clemton ParkEarlwood

Overall score

Clemton Park

37.7/100

Earlwood

66.0/100

Crime rate

Clemton Park

23.8 / 1k

Earlwood

23.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clemton Park

9

Earlwood

228

Population

Clemton Park

1,676

Earlwood

18,053

Metric leadClemton Park 2Earlwood 9across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClemton ParkEarlwood
Overall score37.7/10066.0/100
Housing (desirability)43.1/10030.8/100
Crime rate23.8 / 1k23.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1214
Parks & reserves213
Public transport stops2166
Walkability3.0/10086.0/100
Nearby amenities9228
Planning activity2543
Population1,67618,053
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/109/10

Comparison summary

Clemton Park is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city, while Earlwood is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Clemton Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Earlwood is closer to the city centre.

Clemton Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, while Earlwood stands out for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Earlwood, while Clemton Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons

Clemton Park vs Earlwood, NSW suburb… | Suburb Guide