Overall score
Clemton Park
37.7/100
Earlwood
66.0/100
Clemton Park for families and schools; Earlwood for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clemton Park
37.7/100
Earlwood
66.0/100
Crime rate
Clemton Park
23.8 / 1k
Earlwood
23.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clemton Park
9
Earlwood
228
Population
Clemton Park
1,676
Earlwood
18,053
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clemton Park | Earlwood |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.7/100 | 66.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.1/100 | 30.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.8 / 1k | 23.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 14 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 166 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 86.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 9 | 228 |
| Planning activity | 25 | 43 |
| Population | 1,676 | 18,053 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 9/10 |
Clemton Park is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city, while Earlwood is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Clemton Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Earlwood is closer to the city centre.
Clemton Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, while Earlwood stands out for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Earlwood, while Clemton Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.