Overall score
Campsie
48.6/100
Earlwood
63.3/100
Campsie vs Earlwood, NSW Suburb Comparison
Earlwood for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CampsieEarlwood
Crime rate
Campsie
57.7 / 1k
Earlwood
23.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Campsie
274
Earlwood
250
Population
Campsie
26,132
Earlwood
18,053
Metric leadCampsie 4Earlwood 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Campsie | Earlwood |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.6/100 | 63.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.7/100 | 42.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 57.7 / 1k | 23.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 14 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 112 | 166 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 86.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 274 | 250 |
| Planning activity | 27 | 47 |
| Green cover | 4.2% | 17.8% |
| Population | 26,132 | 18,053 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Campsie reads as an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Earlwood is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Campsie sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Earlwood is closer to the city centre.
Campsie pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Earlwood is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Earlwood, while Campsie remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.