Campsie vs Kingsgrove, NSW Suburb Comparison

Campsie for retirees; Kingsgrove for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CampsieKingsgrove

Overall score

Campsie

48.6/100

Kingsgrove

60.9/100

Crime rate

Campsie

57.7 / 1k

Kingsgrove

43.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Campsie

274

Kingsgrove

310

Population

Campsie

26,132

Kingsgrove

12,881

Metric leadCampsie 1Kingsgrove 93 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCampsieKingsgrove
Overall score48.6/10060.9/100
Housing (desirability)35.7/10053.5/100
Crime rate57.7 / 1k43.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools1313
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1013
Public transport stops112173
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities274310
Planning activity2724
Green cover4.2%4.5%
Population26,13212,881
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/108/10

Comparison summary

Campsie is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Kingsgrove is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Campsie tends to lead on a larger local community, while Kingsgrove stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kingsgrove, while Campsie remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons