Belfield vs Wiley Park, NSW suburb comparison

Belfield for retirees and investment; Wiley Park for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BelfieldWiley Park

Overall score

Belfield

53.7/100

Wiley Park

46.3/100

Crime rate

Belfield

29.0 / 1k

Wiley Park

42.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belfield

81

Wiley Park

85

Population

Belfield

6,555

Wiley Park

10,016

Metric leadBelfield 7Wiley Park 4across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelfieldWiley Park
Overall score53.7/10046.3/100
Housing (desirability)40.2/10015.8/100
Crime rate29.0 / 1k42.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools1519
Parks & reserves72
Public transport stops5748
Walkability36.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities8185
Planning activity62
Population6,55510,016
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Belfield is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Wiley Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Belfield pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Wiley Park is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities and a calmer planning outlook. Belfield generally means more sought-after housing, while Wiley Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Belfield, while Wiley Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons