Belfield vs Greenacre, NSW Suburb Comparison

Belfield for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BelfieldGreenacre

Overall score

Belfield

50.1/100

Greenacre

46.9/100

Crime rate

Belfield

29.0 / 1k

Greenacre

54.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belfield

85

Greenacre

378

Population

Belfield

6,555

Greenacre

26,314

Metric leadBelfield 7Greenacre 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelfieldGreenacre
Overall score50.1/10046.9/100
Housing (desirability)53.8/10023.2/100
Crime rate29.0 / 1k54.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools1513
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves722
Public transport stops57300
Walkability36.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities85378
Planning activity647
Green cover12.9%4.3%
Population6,55526,314
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Belfield is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Greenacre is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Belfield tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Greenacre stands out for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

Retirees and families may find Belfield the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Greenacre.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons