Overall score
Belfield
53.7/100
Greenacre
67.7/100
Belfield for retirees and families; Greenacre for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Belfield
53.7/100
Greenacre
67.7/100
Crime rate
Belfield
29.0 / 1k
Greenacre
54.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belfield
81
Greenacre
372
Population
Belfield
6,555
Greenacre
26,314
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belfield | Greenacre |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.7/100 | 67.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.2/100 | 31.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.0 / 1k | 54.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 15 | 13 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 57 | 300 |
| Walkability | 36.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 81 | 372 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 40 |
| Population | 6,555 | 26,314 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 3/10 |
Put side by side, Belfield is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Greenacre is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Belfield tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Greenacre stands out for schools and education options and parks and reserves. On housing, Belfield sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Greenacre.
Retirees may find Belfield the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Greenacre.