Belfield vs Greenacre, NSW suburb comparison

Belfield for retirees and families; Greenacre for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BelfieldGreenacre

Overall score

Belfield

53.7/100

Greenacre

67.7/100

Crime rate

Belfield

29.0 / 1k

Greenacre

54.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belfield

81

Greenacre

372

Population

Belfield

6,555

Greenacre

26,314

Metric leadBelfield 5Greenacre 6across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelfieldGreenacre
Overall score53.7/10067.7/100
Housing (desirability)40.2/10031.5/100
Crime rate29.0 / 1k54.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools1513
Parks & reserves722
Public transport stops57300
Walkability36.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities81372
Planning activity640
Population6,55526,314
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Belfield is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Greenacre is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Belfield tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Greenacre stands out for schools and education options and parks and reserves. On housing, Belfield sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Greenacre.

Retirees may find Belfield the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Greenacre.

Related comparisons