Greenacre vs Potts Hill, NSW Suburb Comparison

Greenacre for retirees and schools; Potts Hill for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GreenacrePotts Hill

Overall score

Greenacre

46.9/100

Potts Hill

44.2/100

Crime rate

Greenacre

54.4 / 1k

Potts Hill

47.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Greenacre

378

Potts Hill

57

Population

Greenacre

26,314

Potts Hill

1,454

Metric leadGreenacre 7Potts Hill 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGreenacrePotts Hill
Overall score46.9/10044.2/100
Housing (desirability)23.2/10025.6/100
Crime rate54.4 / 1k47.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools1311
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves223
Public transport stops3005
Walkability100.0/1007.5/100
Nearby amenities37857
Planning activity471
Green cover4.3%4.8%
Population26,3141,454
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/109/10

Comparison summary

Greenacre is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Potts Hill is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Greenacre tends to lead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Potts Hill stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Greenacre the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Potts Hill.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons