Overall score
Greenacre
67.7/100
Potts Hill
35.5/100
Greenacre vs Potts Hill, NSW suburb comparison
Greenacre for investment and value; Potts Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GreenacrePotts Hill
Crime rate
Greenacre
54.4 / 1k
Potts Hill
47.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Greenacre
372
Potts Hill
42
Population
Greenacre
26,314
Potts Hill
1,454
Metric leadGreenacre 7Potts Hill 4across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesPotts Hill
- Best for familiesPotts Hill
- Best for investmentGreenacre
- Best for best valueGreenacre
- Best for best schoolsPotts Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Greenacre | Potts Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 67.7/100 | 35.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 31.5/100 | 31.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 54.4 / 1k | 47.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 22 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 300 | 5 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 7.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 372 | 42 |
| Planning activity | 41 | 1 |
| Population | 26,314 | 1,454 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Greenacre is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Potts Hill is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.
Greenacre tends to lead on parks and reserves and public transport access, while Potts Hill stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Greenacre generally means more approachable housing costs, while Potts Hill leans toward more sought-after housing.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Greenacre the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Potts Hill.