Greenacre vs Lakemba, NSW Suburb Comparison

Greenacre for families and value; Lakemba for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GreenacreLakemba

Overall score

Greenacre

46.9/100

Lakemba

45.9/100

Crime rate

Greenacre

54.4 / 1k

Lakemba

42.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Greenacre

378

Lakemba

218

Population

Greenacre

26,314

Lakemba

17,092

Metric leadGreenacre 7Lakemba 42 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGreenacreLakemba
Overall score46.9/10045.9/100
Housing (desirability)23.2/10016.2/100
Crime rate54.4 / 1k42.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools1316
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves2211
Public transport stops300130
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities378218
Planning activity4733
Green cover4.3%5.3%
Population26,31417,092
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/101/10

Comparison summary

Greenacre is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Lakemba is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Greenacre tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Lakemba stands out for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Greenacre, while Lakemba remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons