Overall score
Belfield
53.7/100
Canterbury
62.9/100
Belfield for retirees and value; Canterbury for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Belfield
53.7/100
Canterbury
62.9/100
Crime rate
Belfield
29.0 / 1k
Canterbury
32.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belfield
81
Canterbury
237
Population
Belfield
6,555
Canterbury
9,430
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belfield | Canterbury |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.7/100 | 62.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.2/100 | 11.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.0 / 1k | 32.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 15 | 15 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 57 | 71 |
| Walkability | 36.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 81 | 237 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 12 |
| Population | 6,555 | 9,430 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Belfield is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Canterbury is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Belfield sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Canterbury is closer to the city centre.
Belfield tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Canterbury stands out for schools and education options and public transport access.
Belfield suits retirees and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Canterbury is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.