Belfield vs Canterbury, NSW suburb comparison

Belfield for retirees and value; Canterbury for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BelfieldCanterbury

Overall score

Belfield

53.7/100

Canterbury

62.9/100

Crime rate

Belfield

29.0 / 1k

Canterbury

32.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belfield

81

Canterbury

237

Population

Belfield

6,555

Canterbury

9,430

Metric leadBelfield 4Canterbury 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelfieldCanterbury
Overall score53.7/10062.9/100
Housing (desirability)40.2/10011.4/100
Crime rate29.0 / 1k32.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools1515
Parks & reserves74
Public transport stops5771
Walkability36.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities81237
Planning activity612
Population6,5559,430
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Belfield is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Canterbury is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Belfield sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Canterbury is closer to the city centre.

Belfield tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Canterbury stands out for schools and education options and public transport access.

Belfield suits retirees and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Canterbury is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons