Overall score
Belmore
58.6/100
Canterbury
62.9/100
Belmore for families; Canterbury for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Belmore
58.6/100
Canterbury
62.9/100
Crime rate
Belmore
40.8 / 1k
Canterbury
32.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belmore
144
Canterbury
237
Population
Belmore
13,781
Canterbury
9,430
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belmore | Canterbury |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.6/100 | 62.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 17.3/100 | 11.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 40.8 / 1k | 32.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 19 | 15 |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 109 | 71 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 144 | 237 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 12 |
| Population | 13,781 | 9,430 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 8/10 |
Belmore reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Canterbury is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Belmore sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Canterbury is closer to the city centre.
Belmore tends to lead on housing affordability and schools and education options, while Canterbury stands out for a quieter safety profile and walkability.
On balance, families are more likely to prefer Belmore, while Canterbury remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.