Clemton Park vs Croydon Park, NSW suburb comparison

Clemton Park for families and schools; Croydon Park for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Clemton ParkCroydon Park

Overall score

Clemton Park

37.7/100

Croydon Park

62.8/100

Crime rate

Clemton Park

23.8 / 1k

Croydon Park

27.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clemton Park

9

Croydon Park

232

Population

Clemton Park

1,676

Croydon Park

10,929

Metric leadClemton Park 2Croydon Park 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClemton ParkCroydon Park
Overall score37.7/10062.8/100
Housing (desirability)43.1/10023.2/100
Crime rate23.8 / 1k27.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools1212
Parks & reserves212
Public transport stops273
Walkability3.0/10086.0/100
Nearby amenities9232
Planning activity2524
Population1,67610,929
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/109/10

Comparison summary

Clemton Park reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Croydon Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Clemton Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Croydon Park is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Croydon Park, while Clemton Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons