Darch vs Koondoola, WA Suburb Comparison

Darch for families and value; Koondoola for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DarchKoondoola

Overall score

Darch

50.5/100

Koondoola

38.9/100

Crime rate

Darch

32.4 / 1k

Koondoola

32.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Darch

300

Koondoola

75

Population

Darch

7,347

Koondoola

3,919

Metric leadDarch 7Koondoola 32 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDarchKoondoola
Overall score50.5/10038.9/100
Housing (desirability)40.6/10036.2/100
Crime rate32.4 / 1k32.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools710
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves117
Public transport stops3135
Walkability59.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities30075
Green cover11.2%44.8%
Population7,3473,919
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Darch is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Koondoola is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Darch tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability, while Koondoola stands out for schools and education options, plus public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Darch, while Koondoola remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons