Koondoola vs Landsdale, WA Suburb Comparison

Koondoola for investment; Landsdale for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KoondoolaLandsdale

Overall score

Koondoola

38.9/100

Landsdale

51.6/100

Crime rate

Koondoola

32.4 / 1k

Landsdale

32.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Koondoola

75

Landsdale

183

Population

Koondoola

3,919

Landsdale

15,401

Metric leadKoondoola 2Landsdale 82 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKoondoolaLandsdale
Overall score38.9/10051.6/100
Housing (desirability)36.2/10041.9/100
Crime rate32.4 / 1k32.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools105
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves728
Public transport stops3558
Walkability34.0/10076.0/100
Nearby amenities75183
Green cover44.8%9.1%
Population3,91915,401
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/109/10

Comparison summary

Koondoola reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Landsdale is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Koondoola tends to lead on schools and education options, while Landsdale stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Landsdale, while Koondoola remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons