Koondoola vs Landsdale, WA suburb comparison

Landsdale for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KoondoolaLandsdale

Overall score

Koondoola

39.9/100

Landsdale

62.1/100

Crime rate

Koondoola

2577.9 / 1k

Landsdale

513.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Koondoola

46

Landsdale

105

Population

Koondoola

3,919

Landsdale

15,401

Metric leadKoondoola 1Landsdale 9across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKoondoolaLandsdale
Overall score39.9/10062.1/100
Housing (desirability)38.2/10076.0/100
Crime rate2577.9 / 1k513.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools105
Parks & reserves728
Public transport stops3558
Walkability34.0/10059.0/100
Nearby amenities46105
Population3,91915,401
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/109/10

Comparison summary

Koondoola reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Landsdale is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Koondoola tends to lead on excellent public transport and relatively affordable housing, while Landsdale stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Koondoola generally means more approachable housing costs, while Landsdale leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Landsdale, while Koondoola remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons