Overall score
Dawes Point
54.7/100
Elizabeth Bay
56.6/100
Dawes Point vs Elizabeth Bay, NSW Suburb Comparison
Dawes Point for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Dawes PointElizabeth Bay
Crime rate
Dawes Point
450.3 / 1k
Elizabeth Bay
189.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dawes Point
89
Elizabeth Bay
313
Population
Dawes Point
385
Elizabeth Bay
4,878
Metric leadDawes Point 2Elizabeth Bay 83 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesDawes Point
- Best for investmentDawes Point
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dawes Point | Elizabeth Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.7/100 | 56.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.5/100 | 47.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 450.3 / 1k | 189.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 15 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 12 |
| Walkability | 41.5/100 | 82.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 89 | 313 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 29 |
| Green cover | 17.0% | 6.5% |
| Population | 385 | 4,878 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Dawes Point is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Elizabeth Bay is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Dawes Point pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, whereas Elizabeth Bay is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.
On balance, retirees, families, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Elizabeth Bay, while Dawes Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.