Overall score
Dawes Point
54.7/100
Potts Point
56.0/100
Dawes Point vs Potts Point, NSW Suburb Comparison
Dawes Point for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Dawes PointPotts Point
Crime rate
Dawes Point
450.3 / 1k
Potts Point
189.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dawes Point
89
Potts Point
522
Population
Dawes Point
385
Potts Point
7,183
Metric leadDawes Point 3Potts Point 82 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesDawes Point
- Best for familiesDawes Point
- Best for investmentDawes Point
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dawes Point | Potts Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.7/100 | 56.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.5/100 | 47.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 450.3 / 1k | 189.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 17 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 33 |
| Walkability | 41.5/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 89 | 522 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 57 |
| Green cover | 17.0% | 1.2% |
| Population | 385 | 7,183 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Dawes Point is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Potts Point is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Dawes Point is stronger for parks and reserves, plus a calmer planning outlook; Potts Point answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.
On balance, retirees, families, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Potts Point, while Dawes Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.