Overall score
Millers Point
43.6/100
Potts Point
59.8/100
Potts Point for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Millers Point
43.6/100
Potts Point
59.8/100
Crime rate
Millers Point
450.4 / 1k
Potts Point
189.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Millers Point
152
Potts Point
519
Population
Millers Point
1,735
Potts Point
7,183
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Millers Point | Potts Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.6/100 | 59.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 1.1/100 | 2.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 450.4 / 1k | 189.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 15 | 17 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 14 | 33 |
| Walkability | 51.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 152 | 519 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 45 |
| Population | 1,735 | 7,183 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Millers Point is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Potts Point is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Millers Point is stronger for parks and reserves and a calmer planning outlook; Potts Point answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Potts Point, while Millers Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.