Millers Point vs Potts Point, NSW Suburb Comparison

Millers Point for families and investment; Potts Point for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Millers PointPotts Point

Overall score

Millers Point

51.3/100

Potts Point

56.0/100

Crime rate

Millers Point

450.4 / 1k

Potts Point

189.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Millers Point

164

Potts Point

522

Population

Millers Point

1,735

Potts Point

7,183

Metric leadMillers Point 3Potts Point 82 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMillers PointPotts Point
Overall score51.3/10056.0/100
Housing (desirability)46.8/10047.6/100
Crime rate450.4 / 1k189.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools1517
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves63
Public transport stops1433
Walkability51.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities164522
Planning activity1457
Green cover10.7%1.2%
Population1,7357,183
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Millers Point is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Potts Point is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Millers Point is stronger for parks and reserves, plus a calmer planning outlook; Potts Point answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Potts Point, while Millers Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons