Dawesley vs Harrogate, SA Suburb Comparison

Dawesley for investment and value; Harrogate for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DawesleyHarrogate

Overall score

Dawesley

35.6/100

Harrogate

36.6/100

Crime rate

Dawesley

11.3 / 1k

Harrogate

10.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Dawesley

0

Harrogate

1

Population

Dawesley

316

Harrogate

431

Metric leadDawesley 4Harrogate 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDawesleyHarrogate
Overall score35.6/10036.6/100
Housing (desirability)60.2/10052.8/100
Crime rate11.3 / 1k10.3 / 1k
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops2—
Walkability3.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities01
Planning activity511
Green cover0.0%0.0%
Population316431
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Dawesley is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Harrogate is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Dawesley is stronger for housing affordability, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook; Harrogate answers with a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.

Value-focused buyers may find Dawesley the better fit, while retirees, families, and investors are more likely to prefer Harrogate.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons