Dawesley vs Littlehampton, SA Suburb Comparison

Dawesley for investment; Littlehampton for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DawesleyLittlehampton

Overall score

Dawesley

35.6/100

Littlehampton

50.2/100

Crime rate

Dawesley

11.3 / 1k

Littlehampton

10.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Dawesley

0

Littlehampton

48

Population

Dawesley

316

Littlehampton

3,300

Metric leadDawesley 2Littlehampton 72 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDawesleyLittlehampton
Overall score35.6/10050.2/100
Housing (desirability)60.2/10058.6/100
Crime rate11.3 / 1k10.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops215
Walkability3.0/10053.5/100
Nearby amenities048
Planning activity581
Green cover0.0%2.5%
Population3163,300
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/108/10

Comparison summary

Dawesley reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Littlehampton is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Dawesley sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Littlehampton is in a middle-ring position.

Dawesley tends to lead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, while Littlehampton stands out for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability. On housing, Dawesley sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Littlehampton.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Littlehampton, while Dawesley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons