Dean Park vs Nirimba Fields, NSW Suburb Comparison

Dean Park for investment and value; Nirimba Fields for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Dean ParkNirimba Fields

Overall score

Dean Park

41.5/100

Nirimba Fields

47.5/100

Crime rate

Dean Park

42.7 / 1k

Nirimba Fields

25.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Dean Park

39

Nirimba Fields

66

Population

Dean Park

3,180

Nirimba Fields

1,632

Metric leadDean Park 7Nirimba Fields 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDean ParkNirimba Fields
Overall score41.5/10047.5/100
Housing (desirability)44.0/10027.6/100
Crime rate42.7 / 1k25.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools53
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves31
Public transport stops4713
Walkability30.0/10019.5/100
Nearby amenities3966
Planning activity65
Green cover7.6%5.0%
Population3,1801,632
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/1010/10

Comparison summary

Dean Park reads as a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Nirimba Fields is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap. Dean Park sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Nirimba Fields is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Dean Park is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; Nirimba Fields answers with a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Dean Park suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Nirimba Fields is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons