Desert Springs vs Kilgariff, NT suburb comparison

Desert Springs for retirees and families; Kilgariff for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Desert SpringsKilgariff

Overall score

Desert Springs

36.7/100

Kilgariff

29.5/100

Crime rate

Desert Springs

1446.7 / 1k

Kilgariff

4392.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Desert Springs

66

Kilgariff

6

Population

Desert Springs

1,536

Kilgariff

551

Metric leadDesert Springs 7Kilgariff 11 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDesert SpringsKilgariff
Overall score36.7/10029.5/100
Housing (desirability)35.2/10059.9/100
Crime rate1446.7 / 1k4392.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools41
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops33
Walkability10.5/1004.5/100
Nearby amenities666
Population1,536551
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Desert Springs is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Kilgariff is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.

Desert Springs pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Kilgariff is the better pick for housing affordability. On housing, Desert Springs sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Kilgariff.

Retirees may find Desert Springs the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kilgariff.

Related comparisons