Overall score
Desert Springs
36.7/100
Kilgariff
29.5/100
Desert Springs for retirees and families; Kilgariff for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Desert Springs
36.7/100
Kilgariff
29.5/100
Crime rate
Desert Springs
1446.7 / 1k
Kilgariff
4392.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Desert Springs
66
Kilgariff
6
Population
Desert Springs
1,536
Kilgariff
551
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Desert Springs | Kilgariff |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.7/100 | 29.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.2/100 | 59.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 1446.7 / 1k | 4392.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 3 |
| Walkability | 10.5/100 | 4.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 66 | 6 |
| Population | 1,536 | 551 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Desert Springs is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Kilgariff is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Desert Springs pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Kilgariff is the better pick for housing affordability. On housing, Desert Springs sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Kilgariff.
Retirees may find Desert Springs the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kilgariff.