Overall score
Connellan
23.5/100
Kilgariff
34.2/100
Connellan vs Kilgariff, NT Suburb Comparison
Connellan for investment; Kilgariff for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ConnellanKilgariff
Nearby amenities
Connellan
18
Kilgariff
6
Population
Connellan
371
Kilgariff
551
Metric leadConnellan 3Kilgariff 32 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Connellan | Kilgariff |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 23.5/100 | 34.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.2/100 | 30.8/100 |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 1.6/100 | 1.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 3 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 4.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 18 | 6 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 371 | 551 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Connellan is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Kilgariff is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Connellan pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities, overall desirability, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Kilgariff is the better pick for housing affordability, walkability, and a larger local community. Connellan generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Kilgariff leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Families may find Connellan the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kilgariff.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.