Kilgariff vs Mount Johns, NT Suburb Comparison

Kilgariff for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KilgariffMount Johns

Overall score

Kilgariff

34.2/100

Mount Johns

38.1/100

Nearby amenities

Kilgariff

6

Mount Johns

0

Population

Kilgariff

551

Mount Johns

541

Metric leadKilgariff 3Mount Johns 32 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKilgariffMount Johns
Overall score34.2/10038.1/100
Housing (desirability)30.8/10046.8/100
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)1.6/1001.6/100
Parks & reserves2—
Public transport stops3—
Walkability4.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities60
Green cover0.0%0.0%
Population551541
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/1010/10

Comparison summary

Kilgariff reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Mount Johns is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Johns sits among greener hillside streets, while Kilgariff keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Kilgariff pulls ahead on housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Mount Johns is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage. Kilgariff generally means more mid-market housing value, while Mount Johns leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Kilgariff if you are weighing investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Mount Johns for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons