Overall score
Connellan
23.5/100
Mount Johns
38.1/100
Connellan vs Mount Johns, NT Suburb Comparison
Connellan for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ConnellanMount Johns
Nearby amenities
Connellan
18
Mount Johns
0
Population
Connellan
371
Mount Johns
541
Metric leadConnellan 1Mount Johns 43 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Connellan | Mount Johns |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 23.5/100 | 38.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.2/100 | 46.8/100 |
| Weather (desirability) | 1.6/100 | 1.6/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 18 | 0 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 371 | 541 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Connellan is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Mount Johns is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Johns sits among greener hillside streets, while Connellan keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Connellan pulls ahead on housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, whereas Mount Johns is the better pick for a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Connellan sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Johns.
Choose Connellan if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Mount Johns for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.