Overall score
Connellan
27.8/100
Mount Johns
29.8/100
Connellan vs Mount Johns, NT suburb comparison
Connellan for investment and value; Mount Johns for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ConnellanMount Johns
Nearby amenities
Connellan
17
Mount Johns
0
Population
Connellan
371
Mount Johns
541
Metric leadConnellan 2Mount Johns 31 tiedacross 6 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMount Johns
- Best for familiesMount Johns
- Best for investmentConnellan
- Best for best valueConnellan
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Connellan | Mount Johns |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 27.8/100 | 29.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.3/100 | 7.6/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 17 | 0 |
| Population | 371 | 541 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Connellan is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Mount Johns is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Johns sits among greener hillside streets, while Connellan keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Connellan pulls ahead on housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Mount Johns is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community. On housing, Connellan sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Johns.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Connellan, while Mount Johns remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.