Downer vs Turner, ACT Suburb Comparison

Downer for families and investment; Turner for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DownerTurner

Overall score

Downer

46.9/100

Turner

46.7/100

Crime rate

Downer

15.8 / 1k

Turner

31.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Downer

101

Turner

136

Population

Downer

4,296

Turner

4,470

Metric leadDowner 4Turner 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDownerTurner
Overall score46.9/10046.7/100
Housing (desirability)69.5/10052.3/100
Crime rate15.8 / 1k31.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools108
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves—1
Walkability32.0/10034.5/100
Nearby amenities101136
Planning activity108
Green cover5.3%7.5%
Population4,2964,470
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Downer reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Turner is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Downer tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Turner stands out for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook.

Choose Downer if you are weighing retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Turner for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons