Overall score
Dundowran
33.7/100
Eli Waters
34.1/100
Dundowran vs Eli Waters, QLD Suburb Comparison
Dundowran for retirees; Eli Waters for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
DundowranEli Waters
Crime rate
Dundowran
69.8 / 1k
Eli Waters
69.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dundowran
4
Eli Waters
21
Population
Dundowran
1,085
Eli Waters
3,758
Metric leadDundowran 2Eli Waters 43 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesDundowran
- Best for familiesEli Waters
- Best for investmentEli Waters
- Best for best schoolsEli Waters
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dundowran | Eli Waters |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.7/100 | 34.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.0/100 | 66.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 69.8 / 1k | 69.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4 | 21 |
| Green cover | 8.6% | 3.2% |
| Population | 1,085 | 3,758 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Dundowran is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Eli Waters is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
On the data, Dundowran is stronger for a country-town feel and relatively affordable housing; Eli Waters answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Dundowran sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Eli Waters.
Dundowran suits retirees more clearly, whereas Eli Waters is the stronger match for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.