Overall score
Dutton Park
59.8/100
St Lucia
65.0/100
Dutton Park vs St Lucia, QLD Suburb Comparison
Dutton Park for investment and value; St Lucia for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Dutton ParkSt Lucia
Crime rate
Dutton Park
207.9 / 1k
St Lucia
11.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dutton Park
222
St Lucia
1,341
Population
Dutton Park
2,134
St Lucia
12,220
Metric leadDutton Park 3St Lucia 81 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesSt Lucia
- Best for familiesSt Lucia
- Best for investmentDutton Park
- Best for best valueDutton Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dutton Park | St Lucia |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.8/100 | 65.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.2/100 | 24.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 207.9 / 1k | 11.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 14 |
| Public transport stops | 23 | 55 |
| Walkability | 88.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 222 | 1,341 |
| Green cover | 14.5% | 6.0% |
| Population | 2,134 | 12,220 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Dutton Park is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while St Lucia is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Dutton Park pulls ahead on housing affordability, plus schools and education options, whereas St Lucia is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Investors may find Dutton Park the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer St Lucia.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.