Overall score
Dutton Park
59.8/100
Yeronga
65.1/100
Dutton Park vs Yeronga, QLD Suburb Comparison
Dutton Park for schools; Yeronga for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Dutton ParkYeronga
Crime rate
Dutton Park
207.9 / 1k
Yeronga
63.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dutton Park
222
Yeronga
451
Population
Dutton Park
2,134
Yeronga
7,062
Metric leadDutton Park 2Yeronga 91 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesYeronga
- Best for familiesYeronga
- Best for investmentYeronga
- Best for best valueYeronga
- Best for best schoolsDutton Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dutton Park | Yeronga |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.8/100 | 65.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.2/100 | 63.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 207.9 / 1k | 63.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 23 | 55 |
| Walkability | 88.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 222 | 451 |
| Green cover | 14.5% | 19.7% |
| Population | 2,134 | 7,062 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Dutton Park is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, and Yeronga is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Dutton Park tends to lead on schools and education options, plus walkability, while Yeronga stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.
Choose Dutton Park if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Yeronga for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.