Elizabeth Park vs Hillbank, SA Suburb Comparison

Elizabeth Park for retirees and families; Hillbank for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Elizabeth ParkHillbank

Overall score

Elizabeth Park

24.7/100

Hillbank

29.8/100

Crime rate

Elizabeth Park

134.5 / 1k

Hillbank

98.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Elizabeth Park

83

Hillbank

38

Population

Elizabeth Park

4,428

Hillbank

5,013

Metric leadElizabeth Park 3Hillbank 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryElizabeth ParkHillbank
Overall score24.7/10029.8/100
Housing (desirability)44.6/10059.8/100
Crime rate134.5 / 1k98.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops3128
Walkability30.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities8338
Planning activity6833
Green cover6.9%0.8%
Population4,4285,013
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/104/10

Comparison summary

Elizabeth Park reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Hillbank is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Elizabeth Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Hillbank is further out with more breathing room.

Elizabeth Park tends to lead on public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space, while Hillbank stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability. On housing, Elizabeth Park sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Hillbank.

Choose Elizabeth Park if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Hillbank for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons