Emungalan vs Lansdowne, NT suburb comparison

Emungalan for investment and value; Lansdowne for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EmungalanLansdowne

Overall score

Emungalan

30.4/100

Lansdowne

24.5/100

Nearby amenities

Emungalan

0

Lansdowne

0

Population

Emungalan

254

Lansdowne

499

Metric leadEmungalan 2Lansdowne 22 tiedacross 6 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEmungalanLansdowne
Overall score30.4/10024.5/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10047.1/100
Parks & reserves1
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Population254499
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/108/10

Comparison summary

Emungalan reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Lansdowne is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

On the data, Emungalan is stronger for housing affordability and overall desirability; Lansdowne answers with a quieter safety profile and a larger local community. Emungalan generally means more approachable housing costs, while Lansdowne leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Emungalan the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Lansdowne.

Related comparisons