Katherine vs Lansdowne, NT suburb comparison

Katherine for retirees and families; Lansdowne for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KatherineLansdowne

Overall score

Katherine

47.8/100

Lansdowne

24.5/100

Nearby amenities

Katherine

86

Lansdowne

0

Population

Katherine

1,254

Lansdowne

499

Metric leadKatherine 4Lansdowne 2across 6 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKatherineLansdowne
Overall score47.8/10024.5/100
Housing (desirability)19.0/10047.1/100
Schools & preschools5
Parks & reserves3
Walkability22.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities860
Population1,254499
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Katherine is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Lansdowne is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Katherine tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, while Lansdowne stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Households prioritising schools may find Katherine the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Lansdowne.

Related comparisons